The Eid holiday has ended, but new problems the government must face post-Ramadan are just beginning to emerge, one of which is urbanization. The euphoria of the city’s glitter poisons villagers, making them want to experience it. Many of their relatives who have succeeded in the city ultimately bring great hope for them to join in. Consequently, the number of people returning to the city is once again far greater than the number who previously traveled to their hometowns. This indicates a significant increase in the pace of urbanization.
According to the Deputy for Population Control, the phenomenon of the increasingly busy return flow year after year is no longer just a tradition of homecoming during the Eid holiday; the return flow now takes a more complex form. This reflects structural inequality while simultaneously deepening the gap between the two regions of village and city. The demographic bonus has also surged rapidly, affecting the social and economic inequality of urban society.
Urbanization is tangible proof of high economic disparity occurring within society. The economic inequality between city and village leads villagers to prefer moving from their place of origin to improve their quality of life. As a result, villages lose many young human resources, who should be the backbone of development and sustainability in their regions. Meanwhile, cities become demographically burdened due to the large number of people entering.
Capitalism as the Source of the Urbanization Phenomenon
The high disparity in the economic field is the main foundation for the occurrence of urbanization. Villagers place great hope on living in the city because economic growth there is much higher than in the village. This economic disparity cannot be separated from the policies implemented by the government in a country. Indonesia fundamentally stands on a capitalist economic system. A system that grows and develops on the foundation of inherently limited human thought.
The form of capitalist economics in Indonesia operates within a mixed system. This is marked by the dominance of the private and foreign sectors in the exploitation of natural resources, for example Freeport. The proliferation of modern retail, privatization of state-owned enterprises, and market mechanisms in price determination are also part of the capitalist economic system. Although Indonesia claims to be based on Pancasila, capitalist practices in the field are very clear through economic liberalization and excessive investment.
In addition to the capitalist economic system that creates economic disparity, budget allocations that are Jakarta-centric or city-centric add to the triggers for urban migration because villages are neglected. Although economic programs for villages have been developed and implemented by the government to encourage economic growth. In fact, programs such as village cooperatives (kopdes) and village-owned enterprises (BUMDes) are merely for image-building and are not truly implemented to advance villages as they should be.
On the contrary, funds allocated for village economic development programs become a source of collective corruption. They utilize them as a feast of projects that benefit a handful of specific parties. This is also inseparable from the corrupt mentality that is already ingrained in most officials who hold government positions. They forget they have been sworn in to serve the people, they forget they were chosen by the people to prosper the regions they build. Tempted by worldly material and opportunities that make them forget their duty as servants of the community.
Islam’s View on Urbanization
Islam, with all its regulations, guarantees every need of the community, whether they live in villages or cities. Considering this is an obligation for the government as a servant of the community, the community has the right to receive all the facilities needed for their lives. Consequently, through Islamic economic policy, equitable development in every village and city region can be realized.
The agricultural sector as the main source of livelihood for villagers is highly developed. Not only assisted in terms of capital, but all needs such as equipment, fertilizer, seeds, even pesticides will be facilitated by the government for economic development in the village. Not half-heartedly, the government will even deploy agricultural experts and the use of advanced technology so that the results from the agricultural sector can be surplus and able to meet general food needs.
In addition to production factors being considered, distribution factors are also endeavored to function optimally as possible. Strict supervision to avoid middlemen who exploit farmers’ production results is deployed. So that the distribution of crop production from the agricultural sector can be channeled according to the needs of the wider community, including to the city. From here, a balance between village and city will be apparent, complementing each other’s needs.
Thus, there will no longer be extreme forms of urbanization out of necessity to meet living needs, because everything is already fulfilled by the state in both village and city. This will be difficult to