Where does the value of a themed essay contest that gathers hundreds of suggestions from all sectors of society ultimately lie? The Beijing Municipal Human Resources and Social Security Bureau provides the answer: by establishing a regular mechanism for open consultation and the conversion of suggestions, systematically categorizing, studying, and incorporating them, and tracking their effectiveness throughout the process, the “golden ideas” on paper are precisely transformed into “hard measures” that drive work forward, ensuring every valuable suggestion yields tangible results.
Wide Casting of the “Call for Heroes” Yields “Golden Ideas”
In 2025, the Beijing Municipal Human Resources and Social Security Bureau launched the themed essay contest “Gathering Wisdom for Human Resources and Social Security: Co-writing a New Chapter for the ’15th Five-Year Plan'”, widely soliciting countermeasures and suggestions on major theoretical and practical issues as well as “good ideas” for deepening reform and innovation. It also meticulously set up 84 specific topic “challenge lists” to comprehensively promote a system where capable parties take on challenges and diverse exploration is encouraged, striving to create a strong atmosphere of uniting hearts, pooling wisdom, and gathering strength.
Since its launch in April of that year, the activity received an enthusiastic and broad response from all sectors of society. Experts and scholars from research institutes, representatives from various enterprises, Party members and cadres from the city’s human resources and social security system, and the general public concerned with the development of the capital’s human resources and social security endeavors actively participated. They put forward a series of ideas and viewpoints with both theoretical depth and practical value from multiple perspectives and dimensions, focusing on hot and difficult issues in the human resources and social security field such as promoting high-quality and full employment, improving the social security system, strengthening the construction of technical and skilled talent teams, and building harmonious labor relations. Among these were both countermeasures and suggestions focusing on the macro policy system, emphasizing “specialization” and “depth”, as well as “golden ideas” focusing on specific problems, noted for being “small” yet “precise”.
In mid-December of that year, the selection results were announced. The activity received a total of 360 suggestions and articles, of which 41 articles were rated as excellent “countermeasure and suggestion” works, and 18 suggestions were rated as “golden ideas”.
On January 15 of this year, the Beijing Municipal Human Resources and Social Security Bureau held a summary exchange and expert symposium, presenting certificates to the award-winning representatives.
Precise Prescriptions from All Sectors to Solve Livelihood Challenges
These suggestions and ideas have injected new momentum and vitality into the high-quality development of the capital’s human resources and social security endeavors, with many already being adopted and incorporated into plans.
For example, a team from the School of Labor Economics at Capital University of Economics and Business innovatively proposed a “pyramid”-style regional distribution pattern for the city’s employment quality. They found a severe regional disparity in high-quality full employment in Beijing: Haidian and Chaoyang Districts lead the first tier; Xicheng, Dongcheng, and Fengtai Districts are in the second tier; Daxing, Changping, Shunyi, Shijingshan, and Tongzhou Districts are in the third tier; and the remaining districts are in the fourth tier, with significant differences in overall high-quality full employment scores between tiers. Based on this, they drafted the “Regional Disparities and Optimization Suggestions for High-Quality Full Employment in Beijing”, conducting analyses one by one from the four dimensions of the capital’s functional core area, urban function extension area, urban development new area, and ecological conservation development area. They aimed to tailor solutions, precisely tackle problems, and explore ways to promote the city’s employment pattern from “disparity” towards “optimization”, enabling workers in different regions to achieve high-quality full employment.
The research submitted titled “Research on Difficulties and Countermeasures for Protecting the Rights and Interests of Workers in New Forms of Employment” deeply analyzes the root causes of challenges in protecting the rights and interests of the vast number of flexible workers such as food delivery riders and ride-hailing drivers. It proposes a series of countermeasures and suggestions, including improving laws and regulations, strengthening platform responsibilities, innovating social security systems, and building a multi-party governance mechanism. Examples include “ensuring workers in new business forms are covered by the minimum wage guarantee system” and “platform algorithms adhering to a ‘moderate algorithm’ principle”.
Another example is the analysis submitted titled “Analysis of Methods to Increase the Grassroots Employment Rate of Young People in the Capital”, which keenly captures the structural contradiction in the city where phenomena like “slow employment” and “delayed employment” among some young people coexist with the difficulty