Filtered by: Topstories
The alleged ghost flood control project in Bulacan that angered President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. was an allocation proposed by the Department of Public Works and Highways, and not a congressional insertion from lawmakers, a co-chair of the House Infrastructure Committee stated.
This is based on an analysis of the National Expenditure Program, which contains proposed allocations submitted by the executive branch to the legislative, and the General Appropriations Act, the budget law passed by Congress.
“Many of the flood control projects visited by the President of the Philippines, particularly in Bulacan, and even those in Baguio, are National Expenditure Program-originated projects. These are not congressional initiative-originated projects,” the co-chair said.
“This includes the ghost project supposedly implemented by the first engineering district of Bulacan through SYMS Construction Trading,” he added.
The co-chair noted this also includes the substandard projects in Bulacan that Marcos flagged.
“The substandard project implemented in Bulacan, by the same District Engineering Office and carried out by St. Timothy Construction, is also found in the National Expenditure Program, I think from 2023 or 2022,” he stated.
The Public Works Secretary said he would verify claims that some ghost projects were “National Expenditure Program-originated” and proposed by the DPWH.
“We will try to find out if this is correct. Maybe if it is NEP or initiated, we will try to find out. But for as long as it is a ghost project, then we’ll have to file the necessary charges against those who are included in this program,” the Secretary said.
“In fact, today I think I have issued the preventive suspension of the district offices involved in ghost projects,” he added.
The House Infrastructure Committee will start its investigation on flood control projects and other infrastructure on September 2.
Among those who will be summoned are the top 15 contractors mentioned by the President, as well as officials from the DPWH, Commission on Audit, and Bureau of Internal Revenue.
“There should be criminal charges for ghost projects. If it’s a ₱55 million project that was pocketed, isn’t that already considered plunder?” the co-chair remarked.
When asked if the Public Works Secretary will be held accountable, the co-chair responded, “We will see the level of his responsibility.”
“But, again, if he admitted, for example, that there was failure to check at the level of the Central Office or at the level of the Regional Director, there is ultimate responsibility on the secretary of the Department of Public Works,” he added.
The Secretary denied any involvement in the alleged corrupt practices.
“Absolutely on my part. No, no, no, no. I don’t even have to tolerate this. I don’t tolerate this kind of attitude,” the Secretary said when asked if he could confidently state he did not benefit from any infrastructure project.
“That’s why I’m filing all the charges against anybody who is involved in these ghost projects that were discovered by the President,” he added.
Meanwhile, the Commission on Audit will conduct a technical inspection of all flood control projects from January 1, 2022 to July 31, 2025, whether ongoing or already completed.