The U.S. Senate officially passed a bill to allocate an additional $70 billion to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to strengthen immigration enforcement, marking a significant legislative victory for President Donald Trump.
However, the vote on June 5 was not solely about immigration. Disputes over a $1.8 billion compensation fund for Trump’s allies and plans to build a pickleball court at the White House have exposed divisions within the Republican Party, just ahead of the midterm elections in November.
More funding for deportation campaigns
The bill to add $70 billion to the DHS was passed by the U.S. Senate with 52 votes in favor and 47 against, with all Democratic senators opposing and only one Republican senator voting no.
The bill now moves to the House of Representatives for final review before being sent for signature and enactment.
The new budget will fund Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the Border Patrol for the remainder of Trump’s term. This is one of his key priorities since returning to the White House, aiming to expand raids and deportations across the U.S.
The bill was introduced after a record partial shutdown of the DHS earlier this year. At that time, Democrats refused to support additional funding without restrictive measures, such as banning raids at sensitive locations or prohibiting law enforcement from wearing masks while on duty.
Supporters of the bill argue that the additional funding is necessary to restore resources for ICE and the Border Patrol after a period of budget shortfall.
Republicans also accuse Democrats of trying to “defund” immigration enforcement agencies, even though both agencies still have about $100 billion in unspent funds from a larger DHS budget package passed by Congress last year.

Disputes over Trump’s “slush fund”
Although the bill focuses on immigration, much of the Senate debate revolved around a $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization of government” fund proposed to compensate those who claim they were unfairly treated by the government.
Critics, including some Republican lawmakers, call this a “slush fund” for Trump, which could pave the way for payments to those convicted in connection with the Capitol riot on January 6, 2021.
The fund has not yet been canceled by Congress through legislation, although the White House and the Department of Justice have paused its implementation.
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche affirmed that the administration would not proceed with this plan. However, President Trump has publicly praised the idea and refused to confirm whether the fund has been fully canceled or is just temporarily paused.</p