New Delhi, January 8, 2026. The Supreme Court has reserved its judgment after concluding hearings on the high-profile Judge Case scandal. The case has already generated deep interest in judicial and political circles, making the top court’s final decision extremely significant. During the hearings, the court debated various constitutional and legal aspects in detail.
The Supreme Court reserved its judgment on Thursday regarding the petition filed by Allahabad High Court Judge Justice Yashwant Verma. The bench comprising Justice Deepankar Datta and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma delivered this order after two days of hearings. However, the bench refused to grant Justice Verma an extension to file his response before the parliamentary committee. He must present his response to the parliamentary committee by January 12.
Justice Verma had challenged the impeachment motion brought against him. The petition stated that while impeachment motions were introduced in both houses of Parliament, the Rajya Sabha did not approve it. Despite this, the Lok Sabha alone formed an inquiry committee, which he contends is incorrect.
The Supreme Court carefully heard arguments from both sides and noted that the case is sensitive and carries wide-ranging implications. This is why the court opted to reserve judgment rather than deliver a hasty verdict. This step by the court indicates it is seriously considering all aspects of the matter.
The impact of this case is not limited to the parties involved; it also raises significant questions concerning trust and transparency within the judicial system. Legal experts believe the Supreme Court’s decision could set an important precedent for similar cases in the future.
All eyes are now on the Supreme Court’s final verdict. Regardless of its direction, the decision’s impact on the country’s judicial system and public trust will be far-reaching. Until then, debate and anticipation surrounding the Judge Case scandal will continue.