The Supreme Court on Thursday stayed the University Grants Commission (UGC) Rules for Promoting Equality in Higher Educational Institutions, 2026, until further orders.
The court expressed serious concerns about these rules, stating that many of their provisions are vague and could be misused. The court also indicated that this rule could have a divisive impact on society and educational campuses.
The bench was hearing three writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of these rules.
The bench ordered the issuance of notice to the Central Government and the UGC. The court said the notice must be responded to by March 19. The court also ordered that the pre-2012 UGC rules shall remain in force to ensure students are not left without any grievance redressal mechanism.
During the hearing, the bench raised several concerns orally, stating that its provisions are vague and prone to misuse. The petition questioned the need for a separate definition of caste-based discrimination when a general definition of discrimination already exists. It strongly criticized the complete absence of provisions on ragging.
The court expressed concern that these rules could divide students along caste lines rather than promoting unity. The bench suggested that the rules should be reconsidered by a committee of eminent jurists who understand social realities and values.
Addressing the Solicitor General, the Chief Justice said the court is not in favor of passing a final order immediately and instead wants an expert reconsideration of the matter.
The Chief Justice said there should be a committee with eminent jurists… people who understand social values and the problems society is facing. They should consider how society will progress and how people will behave.